With the massive multi-million dollar media campaign to encourage the multi-billion dollar mass-vaccination campaign, we are selectively shown information to formulate a limited opinion, based on who we believe to be credible.
Just like food used to be a pure source of nutrition once upon a time – what we consider to still be credible sources for our information has also been polluted.
Lets look at where we get our info:
The Mainstream Media (profit based):
Owned by rich elites with their own interests and so will not likely report something that conflicts with them will they? For example in Sweden – scores of side effects stories and 8 people died within hours of receiving the Swine Flu Vaccine within the first 2 weeks of the campaign (officially, but it could be alot more, see the Swedish Medical Products Agency Report for the official results). The media then dropped reporting ALL side effects from the vaccine and instead reported FALSE news about the number of Swine Flu cases and health effects. An example of this is the sudden 80,000 new Swine Flu cases – but actually only 36 people reported in sick for work… It has also come to light, through Freedom of Information requests – that the media has contractual obligations with the vaccine manufacturer on what and what not to report regarding this mass-vaccination campaign. We may never know the real extent of deaths and side effects since ultimately the vaccine manufacturer will be the ones releasing this information after they adjust or approve it.
> Credible? NO
Alternative Media (people based):
In the absence of mainstream news about vaccine side effects, you may be surprised to learn directly from real people – the huge numbers of side effects and deaths of family members, instant miscarriages, etc on websites, comment sections of blogs, and independant news outlets. Regarding miscarriages, the offical mainstream word is that there has been 100% safety rate with the vaccine administered to pregnant women, and side effects including deaths are either no longer reported, seen as normal, or blamed on something else – not only misleading but a complete lie.
> Credible? SUPERIOR TO MAINSTREAM
Family Doctors:
Get paid extra money per vaccination and drug presciptions, and trained in medical school with books supplied by Pharmaceutical Companies – meaning their knowledge is biased. They are not required to obtain it through their own independant scientific findings – often parroting what they are told, and may be influenced by money when forming opinions. Dispite this, the vast majority of doctors and health care workers in most countries, up to 90%, are NOT getting the Swine Flu shot themselves and also refuse to give it – showing that they know something we don’t. If you want to get a vaccine, make the doctor sign a letter so that if you become ill from the vaccine, to ensure they accept full legal liability to the maximum extent of the law for medical negligence, from lack of discussed information about possible side effects and not disclosing what the effects are of the ingredients (more here) that the vaccines contain – something which will effect their opinion quite quickly.
> Credible? UNRELIABLE
Health Ministers:
Those recommending the vaccinations are all found to have conflicting financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers. Those who aren’t, present common sense information to help “naive” people (eg Health Minister of Poland).
> Credible? UNRELIABLE
Medical Magazines:
Even once prestigious ones are now funded and owned by big pharmaceutical companies, who will never publish information to make them look bad, they’re only a way to advertise under the disguise of scientific trials and findings (called infomercials). A good example is independant scientific studies finding that certain drugs, vaccines, x-rays, chemotherapy etc, CAUSE cancer – what an irony that the pharmaceutical companies are receiving vast donations and funding to find the cure. The “peer review” process can be rorted to only be reviewed by scientists batting for the same team.
> Credible? NO
Vaccine Clinical Trials:
Believe it or not, vaccine clinical trials are done in “cohort” fashion, meaning there is no double-blind placebo trial as you would expect, or any study of real life situations like whether the vaccine prevented you catching the flu for example, or any long term effects like autoimmune disease, arthritis, neurological diseases, death, etc. Instead they mearly measure an immune system response and any immediate side effects. The people chosen for the trial are ALWAYS healthy, sometimes they bias a certain age, and in the case of the Swine Flu vaccine have totally excluded Pregnant Women and babies yet assume it’s safe for them. Also, since the trials are done by the vaccine makers themselves who stand to profit from their use – wouldn’t you assume the results are going to be favourable for them?
> Credible? NO
WHO, CDC, FDA, etc:
The WHO is funded by the Rockefeller banking interests – who have repeatedly encouraged depopulation and World Government by force if necessary. The WHO has on it’s Vaccine Advisory Board people from vaccine manufacturers such as Novartis and Baxter, who make the recommendations – which ensure them millions or billions in profits. The CDC, FDA and other health angencies are often involved in conflicts of interests with owning stocks and shares of pharmaceutical companies etc. Most shockingly, they approved both higher amounts of mercury and now SQUALENE which is a classified BIOWEAPON to be included in the 2009 Vaccines. PubMed has concluded that Squalene does NOT improve immune response and in fact creates paralysing autoimmune diseases and death.
> Credible? NO
PubMed, US National Institutes of Health:
Scientific studies that often have different conclusions to the mainstream. Although the studies often follow the latest scare, you can still find some reliable alternate information.
> Credible? GOOD
If you want a good source of information on vaccinations and disease studies, including the current 2009 “Swine Flu” – you’ll be surprised to see information on the US Government National Institutes of Health website PubMed which is sometimes conflicting to the information we receive through the mainstream media, and agencies profiting from this vaccination campaign.
So who to believe?
Unfortunately in today’s world – there is no 100% reliable source of information. But it is wise to at least base your opinions on a variety of sources rather than blindly believe one.
